Fungible - Sabbatical
White House: TARP Money Might Not Be Traceable
This is a misleading headline. The words "traceable" or "untraceable" were not used by Gibbs in yesterday's briefing.
They know where the money went. They were then unable to follow it. *
Gibbs: "...It's a little bit of a push and pull, right -- is the economy going to expand until or unless a small business can get the credit it needs to expand, and vice versa." **
* italics all my words.
** both bold mine
[Speaking of push and pull: Investigator Rules Against Palin in Ethics Probe I mean, why is it so expensive to defend against frivolous claims? And which comes first the dismissal or the legal fees? And is the law followable or traceable by Republicans and vice verse us?***]
*** not to mention "a check of her accounting" and the media's not mentioning that although only 1 of 19 charges have been successful the bulk of her bills (see oops) was to mislead (Oops, that's fungible as the expenses were Alaska's(not her bills) in investigating her false claim regarding the successful "troopergate".)
1 comment:
The oops was in catching my fungible application of data, in that there must be some correlation between Palin's legal fees and Alaska's in investigating her(but I slipped between the two). Two-thirds of the State costs of investigations was for a false claim she initiated to try to reopen "troopergate" which she did lose. Yet it might be cheaper to charge than defend or claim than investigate. But she is claiming that it was Alaska's cost that she was concerned about saving, while her legal fees she denied as the reason,(for her resignation) and then ran afoul of guess what? The law. Which she seems to see as fungible and as it turns out so are costs.
Post a Comment